The Scientist's View

1.29.2007

An artifact?


This is a satellite image from last Thursday. If you recall, we had a strong front pass and snow squalls in the District. This cold air was derived from Canada. In this infrared (IR) enhanced satellite, you can see a green colored mass over Ontario. However, there are no clouds there. This is the IR reporting a very cold mass in Canada. The interesting phenomenon here is that when looking at the Great Lakes, the IR returns disappear. Also of interst is that if you look in Minnesota, the green returns have a "spillage effect" around the west side. While, I find it hard to believe the lakes have such a drastic effect, one can see the upslope snow in the Appalachain Mtns. I wonder if the IR is in fact driven by the context of the underlying ground. If a weather geek knows the answer, please let me know. I am curious about how the IR returns are actually calculated, i.e. is it in context of the underlying ground temperatures?

1 Comments:

At 9:07 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm pretty sure you already know this, but just in case...The way infrared satellite imagery works is that it measures the cloud top temperature. It looks like that image is an Infrared/Visible Satellite composite. If you look closely, you can see clouds uner that large green mass over Canada.
I suspect that the warmer waters off the Great Lakes warmed that portion of the air mass once it moved above the warmer water...resulting in the missing IR imagery over the Great Lakes, hence, warmer air depicted above the water there.
Same would be true for around the western portion of Lake Superior...the air hasn't really spilled over to the west, it just isnt picked up in this image because the water has warmed up that portion of the cold air mass. Sound reasonable?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home